Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Another Night at the Modern (9/26/7)

Posted by Ashlie S., Sarah W., Amanda L., Jasmine H.
Unposted by Cody D., Sloane F., Katie K., Amanda H.



On Wednesday night, September 26, a small group of students in the Language Arts Lab travelled to the Modern Art Museum in Fort Worth to see the Ron Mueck exhibit, followed by a movie and a lecture, that were part of a Film Noir event going on for a few months. [See Resource Blog "Learning Opportunity Announcement"]

The night's theme seemed to mirror a central theme we've been focusing on in class: choices. Looking at and examining Mueck's intricate, mind-blowing sculpture along with watching a detailed documentary about his methods brought to life all the steps that an artist takes to create such elaborate art. Mueck sketches and makes models of different poses - looking for the choice that best expresses the effect that he wants to have. Lots of hard and tedious work later, along with many important decisions in regards to how each detail will affect the viewer, we've got a sculpture.

A beautiful favorite piece in the exhibition was "Spooning Couple." With amazingly realistic qualitites, two people about a foot or two long, lie in bed next to each other - the the looks on
their faces tell you that they may as well be a great distance apart. Mueck made the choice to place them so that, and it's hard to notice this, the bodies aren't actually touching, in order to help portray that distance between them.

As Sarah W. reported, "The Ron Mueck exhibit, our first stop during the trip, was absolutely my favorite part. The exhibit features extraordinary lifelike sculptures made with exquisite craftsmanship by artist, Ron Mueck, the genius behind these incredible works of art. The first sculpture I saw was of Ron Mueck himself. It was just of his face and was at least 4 feet long. This is when I first began to distinguish the extreme details that make his work so profound. I could see the follicles of hair buried within his scalp. Each hair had its own place, and I could see the root from which the hair originated. I even recognized the distinct beard stubbles on his chin and slight imperfections that fall upon ordinary faces, such as wrinkles and red, tired eye lids. I was utterly amazed.

Next, I saw in the corner of the room, a naked, creepy man leaning up against the wall… another one of Mueck’s unique pieces, of course. He differed from the first piece I had seen. He had no hair on his body whatsoever, and was huge in size. However, there were still a vast amount of details in this complex piece. He had age spots atop his head and a very yellow, wrinkly body. His toenails were so perfectly defined, even bent and crooked. He looked up with his beady, daunting eyes, and I felt like he was about to stand up and walk away at any moment. It was so surreal.

In the middle of the exhibit lay a new born baby. She, of course, was not a real baby, but looked remarkably like one! She was still attached to her purple umbilical cord and had amniotic sac blood all over her body. Her eyes were peeled open slightly, as if gazing into her new world for the first time. The bizarre part about the piece is how incredibly huge she was (about as long as the room.) It seemed that all of Mueck’s pieces had this kind of peculiar trait. They were either enormous or very tiny in size. Either way, they were never the "normal" size, and that is what makes them stand out. I personally thought the newborn baby piece was rather gross, however, I also thought it was brilliantly captured and liked it for its artistic concept. Amanda H. thought it was gross too, but after getting past that, found things she liked about it.



What I liked most about the exhibit was that everyone in our group had opinions. Some concentrated on the expressions and creativity of the sculptures. Others were more technically focused on the detail oriented elements of the sculptures. Throughout the exhibit, I was always wondering how Mueck could have possibly achieved such levels of perfection and ingenuity. At the end of the exhibit, my questions were answered when we watched a documentary type video on how he made one of the sculptures. His techniques took long hours and many weeks to complete. I marveled at his techniques and the many steps it took him to complete such a compelling task. One little thing, such as painting on the glimmer of a toenail, took precise expertise and quite a bit of time.

The only thing I was disappointed about was that there were not more pieces displayed. I would love to see more of his pieces someday. Nevertheless, I would encourage everyone to attend the next trip and experience the awesomeness of his creations. I really enjoyed it, and I thank Mr. B for taking us to such a cool exhibit."

A break from the museum brought us to Kincaid's Grocery & Market, a small, informal restaurant boasting several awards for its amazing burgers. You really can't beat fantastic art followed by fantastic food. Unless maybe I found like $12,000 in my coat pocket afterwards. Or something. =]

Amanda L. described the Kincaid's experience this way:
"An old Texas diner, with a new new twist, on its tables red and white checkered tablecloths. [Ed: Did you go to a different Kincaid's from me? It's no diner; there are no tablecloths that I recall. Certainly not where I sat. And since when are red and white checkered tablecloths a new twist for an old diner? It's an old grocery store, still has the shelves where groceries were once displayed. The back counter where you order is still like the meat market counter it used to be.] Bottles of different kinds of hot sauce surrounding napkin holders. Randomly placed [Ed. At the Kincaid's where I ate the placement seemed very orderly to me.] with those there were some upside-down-rightside-up "Heinz Ketchup" bottles and salt/pepper shakers. Eating our foos Jasmine and I rejoiced in the glory of the best burgers we've had in a while [Ed. and the walls were covered with testimonials and awards celebrating the Best Burgers Anywhere Ever.] We took a picture outside the front window before we left. [Ed. And if someone (i.e. Katie) will get me a copy I will post it here.]


Anyway, we headed back to the museum to watch and discuss "Out of the Past", a black and white suspense film from 1947. This twisted, classic film noir movie displayed another set of deliberate and important decisions, including film location, lighting, and camera angles that intentionally make the viewer uncomfortable. Numerous vertical lines splinter the screen, along with the mind. All of these factors (and then some) contribute to the "feel" of the movie, the effect it has. It was interesting to go so deeply behind the final product of the movie itself, to pay attention to details and try to absorb everything that the film had to offer and to recognize that there were choices made by filmmakers who do everything for a reason.

The whole experience was very insightful. Seeing on a larger scale the same ideas we've been toying around with in class with descriptions of cardboard boxes, for example, was fun, and we got to learn outside of a classroom, which is always a positive thing.

(And, if an art museum can be so great, imagine what a place like Santa Fe has to offer, Mr. Benton :) :) nudge, nudge...)

Signing off (and longing for Kincaid's banana pudding),

Ashley S.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

That baby was intense.

Anonymous said...

Youy got that right!

Anonymous said...

I think it interesting that you noted the different aspects of people's opinions when interpreting the Mueck pieces, but I think personally that the video really stood as more of a testament to the crux of his
technique than as a measure of his dedication. Sure, it took a long
time, but that was less important than the extraordinary detail. Maybe it's not that important, but it seems to me the measure of detail is more important than total effort

Anonymous said...

I agree with you about the importance of the video to the overall effect of the Mueck exhibit. And I also think that Mueck's intense and persistent attention to detail is among the most distinctive features of his oeuvre. When I re-read the post in light of your comment, however, I am not sure what you are responding to. In Sarah's and Ashley's posting,I read repeated observations and examples of Mueck's attention to detail both in describing the various pieces and in the reporting on the video. Unless you're reading Sarah to be celebrating various opinions of the exhibit, meaning the sculptures on display and not including the video, and assuming a monolithic opinion of the video, I don't understand what you are responding to.

But, since you mention it, as a writer and teacher of writing, I am certainly impressed (and a bit shamed) by the length of time (dedication, commitment, etc.) such attention to detail demands (as documented in the video) in light of my own willingness to imagine things to be finished (excuse my language)when myriad details, opportunities, and possibilities remain. I find such attention to detail as Mueck exhibits to set an extremely high standard for any artistic creation. And I would suggest that such attention to detail expresses itself in a dedicated, committed, and lengthy process unknown in lesser lights.

I was also struck by the preliminary work that was cast off along the way to the piece that was displayed. The amazingly detailed clay sculpture that was destroyed in the making of the mold, the experimental clay shapes, the sketches and drawings, all might have satisfied an artist with less dedication to a detailed end product. Reminds me of burning the drafts, notes, and outlines to which I have given so much time and detailed attention when the book is published. Sounds easy; works out hard.

Anonymous said...

My favorite piece in this exhibit are the two small, old ladies. Every time I look at them I feel like they're snickering and gossiping about me. It's like their eyes follow me with criticism about how I wear too much black or something.

Anonymous said...

Like little trolls, eh? I agree.I don't think of them as saying nice things, but I don't think they are talking about ME! Paranoia?

Anonymous said...

I hope all you viewers liked my hand-written review of the Ron
Mueck/Film Noir event. I was instructed to give my input on the overall experience, so I summed it all up on a nice little formatted paper. Enjoy!

Anonymous said...

Sorry I couldn't figure out how to post it in a larger size.

Anonymous said...

It's fascinating and yet disturbing at the same time for the sculptures to look so life like. We know they are works of art, but when I look at the photos they seem to have a life of their own, even if they are not "normal sized". Mueck is impressive. I hope to go one day and look
at them.

Anonymous said...

October 21 is the last day!

Anonymous said...

That banana pudding did look really good.I can't wait to hear what the second group had to say about the experience overall. I know I loved it the last time, so I am sure they all had a great time.

Anonymous said...

The Ron Mueck exhibit was probably the most interesting and elaborate
artwork I'v ever seen in my life. The detail and time he took to pin
point every single human trait we, as a people, take for granted is
absolutely extraordinary. As I stood in front of each sculpture, I found it difficult not to stare. Soon, after a few minutes of open-mouthed bewilderment I'd move on to the next piece never completley satisfied with what seemed to be such a short examination of the first. Inevitably the urge to touch a sculpture, if only for a second, was greater than any previous urge to fiddle with the measly dessert displays at
Macaroni Grill. I wanted more than anything feel the surface and
texture of each object, but thinking back on it now, it's probably better that I didn't yield to temptation. For one thing, getting kicked out of the museum for touching the "untouchable" was not on my 'To Do List' that particular afternoon, and, for another thing, I've decided that if all art was meant to be touched, then the affect it once had would be
lost in the realization that its not "real" for lack of a better
example. Not touching the sculptures keeos alive the sneaking suspicion that if I stared too long at the naked man or the little old women that they'd eventually get irritated and yell at me. Write to
have an effect. Create to have an effect. Live to have an effect

Anonymous said...

I liked that film noir was the subject of this blog post. I took a film class over the summer and that was one of our topics to discuss. The film we watched was "Double Indemnity" and I enjoyed it. I guess just
because a film is dark-themed and in black and white doesn't mean it
will necessarily be boring. Also, some of those sculptures were CRAZY!

Anonymous said...

Eunice, you should check out the resource blog posts about film noir. See if they jibe with what you learned in the summer.